Six programmes, one industry

Navigatewithai does not offer a catalogue of general business modules. It offers six desk-level programmes for people who already speak NOR, SOF, CII and SIRE 2.0. Each track is built around the paperwork that desk actually touches, with a seat limit that keeps every attendee on their own documents. Cohorts leave with prompt patterns, a verification routine, and exercises they can repeat after the trainer has gone.

Chartering and post-fixture

For post-fixture operators, laytime clerks, demurrage analysts, charterers’ operations coordinators and claims handlers who live in recaps and statements of facts.

Two-day cohort or 4 × half-day clinics. Twelve seats at most. On-site in Singapore or remote for Europe-facing desks.

A post-fixture desk lives among recaps, statements of facts, notices of readiness and the threads that follow a late NOR or a disputed shifting time. This programme treats those papers as the working material rather than as illustrations of a generic document course. Attendees learn to read a recap against the governing form, to extract laytime events without inventing times the SOF never recorded, and to draft a demurrage narrative a claims handler can check clause by clause. Time is spent on BIMCO wording variants, on reservation of rights in owner–charterer correspondence, and on the NOR conditions that make a tender valid or worthless. The outcome is a first-pass habit that remains fully traceable to the file.

Sessions

  • Reading a recap against the governing charterparty form and listing every departure in plain language.
  • Extracting laytime events from an SOF, including handwritten amendments and poorly scanned columns.
  • Drafting a demurrage claim narrative with clause citations the claims desk can re-check.
  • Comparing two BIMCO clause variants and stating what actually changes in operations.
  • Building a checklist prompt for NOR tendering conditions at the named port.
  • Summarising owner/charterer correspondence threads without losing the reservation of rights.
  • Re-deriving a laytime total by hand once, then marking every figure the model supplied.

What you leave with: a prompt pack for the post-fixture desk, a one-page verification routine for SOF arithmetic, and a record of the exercises used on the cohort’s own redacted papers.

Technical and fleet management

For fleet superintendents, technical assistants, dry-dock planners and shore staff who turn defect notes into planned-maintenance work and prepare ships for inspection.

Two-day cohort or six-week embedded format. Twelve seats at most. Clinics of eight for a single fleet team.

Technical desks already hold more unstructured text than most other shore functions: defect notes written at sea, maker circulars, class status extracts, spare-part requisitions and the observation language that follows a SIRE 2.0 inspection. This programme trains the desk to turn that text into something a planned maintenance system can accept, without letting a model invent a job that was never raised. Attendees practise jurisdiction-specific PSC preparation, draft observation responses that stay inside the facts on file, and summarise survey status so a commercial colleague can read it. Every output is checked against the source note, the SMS job code, or the class listing. The course does not claim that a tool is class-approved; it teaches the desk to keep a human signature on anything that leaves the office.

Sessions

  • Turning superintendent defect notes into PMS-ready work orders with the original wording preserved.
  • Preparing a vessel for PSC with a jurisdiction-specific deficiency history, not a generic checklist.
  • Drafting SIRE 2.0 observation responses that do not add facts the file does not contain.
  • Summarising class survey status for a commercial or operations reader.
  • Triaging spare-part requisitions against maker identity, criticality and open work orders.
  • Building a first-pass dry-dock specification from accumulated defect lists.
  • Comparing maker circulars with the vessel’s equipment list before a bulletin is circulated.

What you leave with: a prompt pack for the technical desk, a one-page verification routine for work-order text, and a record of the exercises used.

Bunkering and voyage economics

For bunker buyers, voyage estimators, operators who stem fuel, and commercial staff who must compare tenders on a common basis before a stem is confirmed.

Two-day cohort or 4 × half-day clinics. Eight to twelve seats. Half-day clinic available for a single workflow.

Bunker and voyage work is number-heavy and unforgiving of a model that rounds, drops a unit, or quietly changes a delivery window. This programme trains buyers and operators to put tenders onto one basis, to read a bunker delivery note and a lab result into an exception note a claims file can use, and to sanity-check the assumptions sitting underneath a voyage estimate. Speed and consumption tables are built so that every figure still points at a noon report or a sea-trial sheet. Quality claim letters are drafted with the BDN, the specification and the lab certificate cited, not paraphrased into something smoother than the evidence. The drill throughout is to re-derive totals and to refuse any output that cannot show its source line.

Sessions

  • Comparing bunker tenders on a common basis, including density, sulphur, delivery window and barging terms.
  • Reading a BDN and lab results into a clear exception note without inventing off-spec language.
  • Building speed and consumption comparison tables tied to named noon reports.
  • Sanity-checking voyage estimate assumptions before they harden into a recap figure.
  • Drafting a quality claim letter with clause, specification and certificate citations.
  • Reconciling remaining-on-board figures against delivery notes and sounding logs.
  • Flagging risky quality language in a supplier offer before the stem is confirmed.

What you leave with: a prompt pack for the bunker desk, a one-page verification routine for tender arithmetic, and a record of the exercises used.

Emissions and regulatory reporting

For emissions reporting officers, environmental superintendents, MRV/DCS coordinators and commercial staff who must explain a CII rating or an EU ETS narrative to colleagues.

Two-day cohort or six-week embedded format. Twelve seats at most. Remote sessions timed for Europe-facing reporting desks.

Emissions work is an evidence trail, not a prose exercise. This programme trains the desk to assemble MRV and DCS packs that a verifier can follow, to explain a CII rating to commercial colleagues without overstating causes, and to write EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime allowance narratives that still point at noon reports, bunker delivery notes and port logs. Attendees reconcile consumption figures across those sources and prepare answers to the queries verifiers actually raise, rather than generating a polished summary that cannot be audited. Data gaps are mapped before a reporting period closes. The course never states that a tool is compliant with a regulation; it teaches people to keep every number checkable and to leave a human signature on anything filed.

Sessions

  • Assembling MRV/DCS evidence trails from noon reports, BDNs and port logs.
  • Writing CII rating explanations that commercial colleagues can use without inflating causes.
  • Drafting EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime allowance narratives with named sources.
  • Reconciling noon-report consumption with bunker delivery figures and ROB movements.
  • Preparing replies to typical verifier queries without filling gaps from memory.
  • Mapping data gaps before a reporting period closes, with owners assigned on the desk.
  • Drafting an internal note on a rating change that stays inside the evidence on file.

What you leave with: a prompt pack for the emissions desk, a one-page verification routine for consumption reconciliations, and a record of the exercises used.

HSEQ, incidents and audits

For HSEQ officers, designated persons ashore, incident investigators and internal auditors who must keep near-miss and audit text inside the facts the SMS already holds.

Two-day cohort or 4 × half-day clinics. Eight seats preferred where incident files are in the room. On-site preferred.

HSEQ writing fails in a particular way when a model is left unsupervised: it supplies a root cause that sounds complete, categories that were never in the SMS, and corrective actions nobody actually raised. This programme trains officers to structure near-miss text into analysable categories the company already uses, to draft root-cause sections that refuse invented facts, and to build internal audit checklists from the safety management system rather than from a generic maritime template. Management review summaries are practised as a compression of what the file contains, not as a fresh narrative. Incident specifics that sit under legal privilege are never pasted into a consumer tool. The desk leaves able to use a model as a clerk, not as an investigator.

Sessions

  • Structuring near-miss text into the analysable categories already defined in the SMS.
  • Drafting root-cause sections that stop at the evidence and flag every gap in the file.
  • Building internal audit checklists from the company’s own SMS, not a borrowed template.
  • Preparing management review summaries that compress existing reports without new claims.
  • Turning an incident timeline into a checkable chronology with source stamps.
  • Drafting a PSC detention briefing for shore management from the deficiency list only.
  • Extracting corrective actions that are actually recorded, and listing those that are not.

What you leave with: a prompt pack for the HSEQ desk, a one-page verification routine for incident prose, and a record of the exercises used.

Crewing and shore-side administration

For crewing coordinators, fleet personnel officers and shore administrators who handle circulars, certificate matrices, joining instructions and document sets under data-protection constraints.

Two-day cohort or 4 × half-day clinics. Twelve seats at most. Mandarin-language handouts on request.

Crewing work mixes languages, dates and personal data, which is exactly where an unsupervised model becomes a liability. This programme trains coordinators to draft multilingual crew circulars that keep ranks and names out of the wrong channel, to matriculate certificate expiry data into a checkable list, and to write joining instructions that a seafarer can follow without exposing passport or medical detail to a public tool. Document sets are handled under a redaction rule that is practised in the room, not described as a policy slide. The desk learns which fields may never be pasted into a consumer chatbot, how an enterprise tenancy changes that boundary, and how to keep a human signature on anything that leaves crewing. The aim is cleaner administration, not a substitute for the manning agency or the flag.

Sessions

  • Drafting a crew circular in three languages from one approved English source text.
  • Matriculating certificate expiry data into a list that still points at the source scan.
  • Drafting joining instructions without embedding passport, bank or medical detail.
  • Handling mixed document sets under a redaction rule practised live in the room.
  • Preparing a relief-plan summary from rotation sheets for a commercial reader.
  • Writing a flag-state manning note that a chartering desk can use without HR fields.
  • Checking that a circular does not include names or ranks that should stay in the HR system.

What you leave with: a prompt pack for the crewing desk, a one-page verification routine for personal-data handling, and a record of the exercises used.